by Michael Ceraolo
And the robber barons founded colleges,
which were endowed by their Creators
to hire a variety of professors,
and
then some of those professors were fired
in deference to the supposed wishes,
or the actual wishes,
of those founders,
or members of the founder's family
A few examples:
"If the railroads would expect their men
to be law-abiding,
they must set the example
Let their open violation
of the interstate commerce law
and the relations to corrupt
legislatures and assessors
testify as to their past in this regard"
was part of a speech on the Pullman strike
given by Edward W. Bemis,
a professor
at Rockefeller's University of Chicago
And
this speech prompted William Rainey Harper,
the president of the university,
to say:
"It is hardly safe for me to venture
into any of the Chicago clubs
I am pounced upon from all sides
I propose that during the remainder
of your connection with the University
you exercise very great care
in public utterance about
questions that are agitating
the minds of the people",
and
despite the dubious claim
that this wasn't a threat,
Bemis was fired at the end of the school year
"I cannot with self-respect decline to speak
on topics to which I have given
years of investigation
It is my duty as an economist,
to impart,
on occasion,
to sober people,
and in a scientific spirit,
my conclusions
on subjects with which I am expert"
was said by Edward A, Ross,
a professor at Stanford,
and
though Leland Stanford was dead,
his wife remained a prime mover
in university affairs,
saying:
"There is a very deep and bitter feeling
of indignation throughout the community . . .
to partisanism and even to dangerous socialism"
"Professor Ross cannot be trusted,
and he should go",
and he did
All professors
"should make a contribution
to our students and the University
but also to the society at large"
said Scott Nearing,
an instructor
in sociology at the Wharton School of Finance
at the University of Pennsylvania,
the school
from which Nearing had earned his
undergraduate and graduate degrees,
and
he backed his words with actions
When his appointment was up for renewal
the Dean of the Wharton School,
the chair of his department,
and
a large majority of the faculty
recommended re-appointment
But
the trustees disagreed,
saying
that Nearing "aroused class prejudice"
that he
"advocated the ruthless re-distribution of property"
that his views were
"wholly
at variance with those of the founder
[Mr. Wharton],
and
in defiance of
the conservative opinions of men of affairs"
And
those 'men of affairs' did not re-appoint him
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment